Mazda CX-5 vs VW T-Cross: The Definitive, Data-Rich Comparison for Real-World Buyers

When choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen T-Cross, it’s not enough to skim through basic specs. We dive deep into performance, efficiency, space, comfort, and daily usability to help you decide which SUV genuinely delivers the best value for your lifestyle. With a carefully researched, richly detailed breakdown, we reveal where each model excels — and where it falls short.

Performance Showdown: Power, Acceleration & Driving Feel

Horsepower & Engine Character

The T-Cross enters the ring with a subtle horsepower advantage. Its range-topping 150 hp turbo-petrol gives it a sharper response and more spirited mid-range pull compared with the CX-5’s 141 hp mild-hybrid petrol. While the difference of 9 hp isn’t dramatic, the VW’s lighter chassis amplifies this advantage on the road.

0–100 km/h Acceleration

Acceleration matters when you need confident overtaking or merging onto fast-moving motorways.

• VW T-Cross: 8.4 seconds (fastest version)
• Mazda CX-5: 10.5 seconds

The VW is 2.1 seconds quicker, a difference you feel instantly.

Top Speed

• VW T-Cross: Up to 200 km/h
• Mazda CX-5: 195 km/h

The gap isn't huge, but it reinforces the VW’s slightly sportier character.

Torque & Flexibility

Torque defines how effortlessly a car moves, especially at low revs.

Toyota Corolla AE86 Engine Swap – The Ultimate Guide

• T-Cross: 175–250 Nm
• CX-5: 238 Nm

The VW’s 250 Nm maximum is impressive considering its smaller engines. The Mazda delivers smooth, refined pull but carries more weight.

Weight & Agility

• T-Cross: 1267–1338 kg
• CX-5: 1629 kg

The Mazda’s 362 kg extra mass affects acceleration, handling agility, and fuel consumption.

Cost & Fuel Efficiency: Where the Wallet Wins

Pricing

• VW T-Cross: From €26,200
• Mazda CX-5: From €37,300

The Mazda demands €11,000+ more, instantly positioning the CX-5 as a premium, larger, and more comfort-oriented SUV.

Fuel Consumption

This category heavily favours VW:

• T-Cross: 5.4–6 L/100 km
• CX-5: 7 L/100 km

Expect the VW to save 1.6 litres per 100 km, translating into substantial long-term fuel savings.

CO₂ Emissions

• T-Cross: 124–136 g/km
• CX-5: 157 g/km

More efficiency means lower tax costs and less environmental impact.

Toyota Corolla AE86 Engine Swap – The Ultimate Guide

Does the Toyota Camry Have CVT Transmission?

Space, Practicality & Comfort

Passenger Comfort

Both vehicles seat five occupants, but the experience differs entirely.

• The Mazda CX-5 feels more premium, quieter, and designed for long-distance comfort.
• The VW T-Cross prioritises clever packaging, upright seating, and excellent urban visibility.

Boot Space

One of the biggest differences lies here:

• CX-5: 583 L
• T-Cross: 455 L

The Mazda offers 128 L more, a major advantage for families needing space for strollers, luggage, or pets.

Maximum Cargo Capacity

• CX-5: 2019 L
• T-Cross: 1281 L

This dramatic difference (738 L) shows how much more versatile the Mazda is when all seats are folded.

Dimensions Snapshot

The CX-5 is significantly larger, ideal for families. The T-Cross is compact and agile — perfect for city driving and tight parking.

Powertrain & Mechanical Options

Engines & Transmission

The Mazda uses a 2.5L mild-hybrid petrol, while the T-Cross offers a 1.0 TSI and a 1.5 TSI with optional 7-speed DSG dual-clutch.

Toyota Corolla AE86 Engine Swap – The Ultimate Guide

Does the Toyota Camry Have CVT Transmission?

Toyota Camry Trim Levels 2014: A Detailed Guide to Choosing the Best

Cylinder Count

• Mazda: 4 cylinders
• VW: 3–4 cylinders

Drivetrain

Both are front-wheel drive, aimed at efficiency and everyday usability.

Driving Personality: Who Each SUV Is Built For

Mazda CX-5

• Designed for comfort-first drivers
• Feels refined and premium
• Superb motorway cruiser
• Ideal for families needing more space
• Better long-distance comfort and insulation

VW T-Cross

• Light, agile, city-friendly
• Lower running costs
• More affordable to purchase
• Compact footprint for easy parking
• Surprisingly energetic performance

Verdict: Which SUV Should You Choose?

Choose the VW T-Cross if you want:

• Lower purchase price
• Better fuel efficiency
• Lighter, easier urban driving
• Faster acceleration and slightly sportier feel

Choose the Mazda CX-5 if you prioritise:

• Premium comfort and interior quality
• Vast boot space and more versatility
• Long-distance refinement
• A larger, more family-oriented SUV

Overall Winner

For buyers focused on value, efficiency, and everyday usability, the VW T-Cross emerges as the more balanced choice.
But for comfort, refinement, and family practicality, the Mazda CX-5 remains a standout.

If you want to know other articles similar to Mazda CX-5 vs VW T-Cross: The Definitive, Data-Rich Comparison for Real-World Buyers you can visit the category Models.