Ford Puma vs Ford Focus: Complete 2025 Comparison of Specs, Efficiency, and Performance

When deciding between the Ford Puma and the Ford Focus, buyers are essentially choosing between a compact SUV and a dynamic hatchback — two vehicles built on Ford’s legacy of performance, efficiency, and practicality. In this comprehensive comparison, we analyze every critical aspect — from design, engine, and technology to running costs and driving dynamics — to help determine which one truly fits your lifestyle.

Content in this publication

Design and Dimensions

The Ford Focus maintains its sharp, aerodynamic hatchback styling with a low stance that favors agility. It measures 4,392–4,397 mm in length, 1,825–1,844 mm in width, and 1,438–1,482 mm in height — proportions that enhance stability and driving dynamics.

In contrast, the Ford Puma adopts a bold, modern SUV profile. It’s slightly shorter at 4,186–4,226 mm, with a width of 1,805 mm and a height of 1,550–1,555 mm. Its elevated ride height and sculpted design make it stand out in urban traffic while offering greater visibility.


Interior Comfort and Practicality

The Puma offers a higher driving position and improved headroom, making it ideal for families or those who prefer an SUV’s commanding perspective. Its materials feel premium, and the cabin features innovative storage — including the “MegaBox” beneath the boot floor for added utility.

The Focus, meanwhile, focuses on driver ergonomics and sporty appeal. It provides generous legroom for passengers, supportive seats, and a well-laid-out dashboard with minimal clutter, perfect for long-distance comfort.


Engines and Performance

Ford Puma

  • Engine Options: 1.0L EcoBoost MHEV (Mild Hybrid)
  • Power Output: 125 HP, 155 HP, or 160 HP (depending on trim)
  • Acceleration (0–100 km/h): 7.4–9.8 seconds
  • Top Speed: 160–210 km/h
  • Torque: 170–290 Nm

Ford Focus

  • Engine Options: 1.0L EcoBoost (MHEV), 1.5L Diesel, 2.3L EcoBoost
  • Power Output: 115 HP to a performance-ready 280 HP in the ST model
  • Acceleration (0–100 km/h): 5.7–11.8 seconds
  • Top Speed: 186–250 km/h
  • Torque: 170–420 Nm

If you value speed and spirited performance, the Focus ST dominates with its turbocharged 2.3L engine. However, the Puma’s hybrid system delivers smoother acceleration and better urban fuel economy.


Fuel Efficiency and CO₂ Emissions

  • Ford Puma:
    • Fuel Consumption: 5.4–6.0 L/100 km
    • Electric Consumption (Puma Electric): 13.1–13.7 kWh/100 km
    • CO₂ Emissions: 0–136 g/km
  • Ford Focus:
    • Fuel Consumption: 4.9–8.0 L/100 km
    • CO₂ Emissions: 117–183 g/km

In real-world conditions, the Puma performs better in city driving with its hybrid efficiency, while the Focus achieves lower fuel consumption on highways.

You may be interested in readingFord Puma vs Skoda Kamiq: Ultimate SUV Comparison 2025Ford Puma vs Skoda Kamiq: Ultimate SUV Comparison 2025

Transmission and Driving Dynamics

Both models feature manual and automatic options, including Ford’s dual-clutch automatic for faster, seamless gear changes.

  • Puma Handling: Agile, responsive, ideal for urban routes and tight turns.
  • Focus Handling: More stable at high speeds, offering excellent cornering control and steering precision.

Technology and Infotainment

Both vehicles are equipped with Ford’s SYNC 4 infotainment system, offering:

  • 8–13.2-inch touchscreen
  • Apple CarPlay and Android Auto
  • Over-the-air software updates
  • Voice command and navigation integration

The Puma includes advanced driver aids such as adaptive cruise control, lane centering, and parking assist, while the Focus enhances the digital experience with a 12.3-inch digital cluster and connected navigation.


Safety and Driver Assistance

Both cars are rated 5 stars by Euro NCAP, integrating advanced safety features:

  • Pre-collision assist with automatic braking
  • Blind-spot monitoring
  • Traffic sign recognition
  • Lane-keeping assist
  • Automatic high-beam control

The Puma also offers rear cross-traffic alert, while the Focus benefits from enhanced structural rigidity and improved crash mitigation.


Cargo Space and Utility

  • Ford Puma: 456–523 L boot capacity (best in class for compact SUVs)
  • Ford Focus: 392 L boot capacity

With foldable rear seats and the MegaBox storage compartment, the Puma provides a superior balance between size and versatility.


Running Costs and Maintenance

  • Ford Puma: Lower overall maintenance cost thanks to its hybrid system and smaller displacement.
  • Ford Focus: Slightly higher servicing costs, especially in high-performance variants.

Both models offer long service intervals (up to 20,000 km or 12 months) and come with a 2-year manufacturer warranty extendable through Ford Protect.

You may be interested in readingFord Puma vs Skoda Kamiq: Ultimate SUV Comparison 2025Ford Puma vs Skoda Kamiq: Ultimate SUV Comparison 2025
You may be interested in readingToyota RAV4 Gas Tank Size (1994–2025): Complete Guide by Year & ModelToyota RAV4 Gas Tank Size (1994–2025): Complete Guide by Year & Model

Pricing and Trim Levels

ModelStarting Price (€)Top Trim (€)Available Powertrains
Ford Puma30,80043,200Petrol, MHEV, Electric
Ford Focus32,60055,600Petrol, Diesel, MHEV

While the Focus starts slightly higher, the Puma delivers better value for those seeking a blend of technology, design, and efficiency.


Performance Comparison Table

SpecificationFord PumaFord Focus
Horsepower125–168 HP115–280 HP
Torque170–290 Nm170–420 Nm
0–100 km/h7.4–9.8 s5.7–11.8 s
Top Speed160–210 km/h186–250 km/h
TransmissionManual / AutomaticManual / Dual-clutch Auto
Drive TypeFront-wheelFront-wheel

Fuel Economy Comparison Table

TypeFord PumaFord Focus
Petrol Consumption5.4–6.0 L/100 km4.9–8.0 L/100 km
Electric Consumption13.1–13.7 kWh/100 km
CO₂ Emissions0–136 g/km117–183 g/km
Tank Capacity42 L52 L

Final Verdict: Which Ford Should You Choose?

  • Choose the Ford Puma if you value modern SUV styling, urban maneuverability, hybrid efficiency, and innovative cargo solutions.
  • Opt for the Ford Focus if you prefer high-speed performance, dynamic handling, and more powerful engine options.

For most everyday drivers, the Puma represents the future — a versatile, eco-conscious compact SUV that excels in both city and highway conditions. The Focus, however, remains the purist’s choice for driving enthusiasts.

FAQs

1. Is the Ford Puma more fuel-efficient than the Focus?
Yes, especially in city driving conditions where its mild-hybrid system optimizes fuel use.

2. Which model has more cargo space?
The Puma offers up to 523 liters — significantly more than the Focus’s 392 liters.

3. Does the Ford Focus have a hybrid version?
Yes, the Focus MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle) combines improved efficiency with conventional petrol power.

4. Which car is faster?
The Focus ST, with 280 HP, outperforms the Puma in acceleration and top speed.

5. Which is better for families?
The Puma’s higher seating position, superior cargo space, and safety features make it the better all-around family vehicle.

You may be interested in readingFord Puma vs Skoda Kamiq: Ultimate SUV Comparison 2025Ford Puma vs Skoda Kamiq: Ultimate SUV Comparison 2025
You may be interested in readingToyota RAV4 Gas Tank Size (1994–2025): Complete Guide by Year & ModelToyota RAV4 Gas Tank Size (1994–2025): Complete Guide by Year & Model
You may be interested in readingToyota RAV4 Dashboard Warning Lights and Symbols (2001–2024)Toyota RAV4 Dashboard Warning Lights and Symbols (2001–2024)

If you want to know other articles similar to Ford Puma vs Ford Focus: Complete 2025 Comparison of Specs, Efficiency, and Performance you can visit the category Blog.

Auto Guide

I show you the best reviews of all car brands in the USA, the information we collect and show is verified by our mechanics, we hope that everything you read here is useful to buy the car of your dreams

More content of your interest

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

Subir