Ford Puma vs Nissan Juke: Ultimate Compact SUV Comparison for 2025

The compact SUV market has never been more competitive, and two names consistently rise to the top — the Ford Puma and the Nissan Juke. Both deliver a unique blend of bold design, efficient performance, and everyday practicality. Yet, beneath the surface, they cater to very different driving personalities. In this definitive 2025 comparison, we explore every crucial detail — from power and performance to cargo space, fuel efficiency, and tech — to help you decide which of these dynamic SUVs truly fits your lifestyle.

Overview: Two Titans of the Compact SUV Class

Both the Ford Puma and Nissan Juke share urban agility and SUV practicality, but their approaches differ.

• The Ford Puma targets drivers who want sportiness with hybrid efficiency.
• The Nissan Juke appeals to those who value design flair and comfort above all.

Let’s break down the real-world distinctions that matter most.

Engine Options and Performance

Ford Puma: Mild Hybrid Efficiency Meets Punchy Power

The Ford Puma offers a diverse engine lineup, including mild-hybrid (MHEV) and fully electric options.

• Power range: 125–168 HP
• Torque: 170–290 Nm
• Transmission: 6-speed manual or 7-speed dual-clutch automatic
• Acceleration (0–100 km/h): 7.4–9.8 seconds
• Top speed: Up to 210 km/h

Ford’s award-winning 1.0-litre EcoBoost hybrid engine combines turbocharged responsiveness with regenerative braking technology, making it both thrilling and fuel-efficient. For urban drivers seeking low emissions and quick responsiveness, the Puma’s setup is near perfect.

Nissan Juke: Balanced Hybrid Power for Urban Versatility

The Nissan Juke offers a 1.0-litre turbo petrol engine and a 1.6-litre hybrid system, blending petrol and electric power for smoother acceleration and improved efficiency.

• Power range: 114–143 HP
• Torque: 200 Nm
• Transmission: Manual or dual-clutch automatic
• Acceleration (0–100 km/h): 10.1–11.8 seconds
• Top speed: 166–180 km/h

The Juke prioritizes comfort over outright performance, delivering linear power and quiet operation in city traffic.

Fuel Economy and CO₂ Emissions

Ford Puma

• Fuel consumption: 5.4–6.0 L/100 km
• Electric consumption (EV variant): 13.1–13.7 kWh/100 km
• Electric range: Up to 376 km
• CO₂ emissions: 0–136 g/km

Nissan Juke

• Fuel consumption: 4.7–6.0 L/100 km
• Battery capacity (hybrid): 0.6 kWh
• CO₂ emissions: 107–136 g/km

While the Juke wins slightly in fuel efficiency, the Puma’s electric version sets a new standard for hybrid versatility, combining extended range with strong performance.

Driving Dynamics and Ride Comfort

Ford Puma: Agile and Engaging

Built on Ford’s dynamic B-platform, the Puma delivers a sharp, controlled ride. Its lightweight chassis and precise steering give it a sporty feel rarely found in compact SUVs. Optional Sport suspension and EcoBoost Hybrid tuning make cornering confident and composed.

Nissan Juke vs Toyota C-HR: Complete Comparison of Specs, Performance, Efficiency, Space, and Cost

Nissan Juke: Smooth and Refined

The Juke favours comfort, offering a softer suspension setup that absorbs urban bumps effortlessly. The steering is light and ideal for tight city manoeuvres, while the hybrid system ensures smooth, near-silent acceleration at low speeds.

Interior Space and Practicality

The Ford Puma dominates in cargo space, offering up to 523 litres — among the best in its class. Its “MegaBox” storage compartment beneath the boot floor provides extra flexibility for tall or wet items.

The Nissan Juke, though smaller, compensates with better vertical space and a higher seating position, ideal for those who prefer better road visibility.

Design and Exterior Features

Ford Puma: Athletic and Aerodynamic

With its sleek lines, athletic proportions, and signature LED headlights, the Ford Puma exudes energy. It balances elegance with aerodynamics, enhancing fuel economy while projecting a sporty character.

Notable design features:

• Aggressive front fascia with wide grille
• Sculpted body lines improving airflow
• Available contrast roof options

Nissan Juke: Bold and Distinctive

The Juke remains one of the most recognizable compact SUVs thanks to its unconventional design. Its split-level headlight setup, muscular arches, and floating roofline express personality and confidence.

Highlights include:

• 19-inch alloy wheel options
• Striking two-tone colour schemes
• V-Motion grille inspired by Nissan’s latest design DNA

Technology and Infotainment

Both vehicles deliver cutting-edge infotainment systems, but their focus differs.

Ford Puma Technology

• 12.3-inch Digital Cluster
• 8-inch SYNC 3 infotainment with Apple CarPlay & Android Auto
• Wireless charging
• FordPass Connect for remote monitoring and updates

Nissan Juke Technology

• 8-inch NissanConnect display
• 360° Around View Monitor
• Voice recognition with Google Assistant & Alexa integration
• Bose Personal Plus 8-speaker sound system

While the Puma offers a more driver-centric interface, the Juke’s sound system and voice integration stand out for everyday connectivity.

Nissan Juke vs Toyota C-HR: Complete Comparison of Specs, Performance, Efficiency, Space, and Cost

Are Nissan Juke Reliable? The Ultimate Reliability and Maintenance Guide (2025 Edition)

Safety and Driver Assistance

Ford Puma Safety Systems

• Adaptive Cruise Control
• Lane-Keeping Aid
• Pre-Collision Assist with Pedestrian Detection
• Traffic Sign Recognition

Nissan Juke Safety Systems

• Intelligent Emergency Braking
• Blind Spot Intervention
• 360° Camera with Moving Object Detection
• Rear Cross Traffic Alert

Both models earned high Euro NCAP safety ratings, but the Juke’s ProPILOT system gives it an advantage for semi-autonomous driving.

Price and Value for Money

The Nissan Juke offers a lower entry price, making it ideal for budget-conscious buyers. The Ford Puma, however, justifies its higher cost with hybrid technology, stronger acceleration, and premium finishes.

CO₂ Efficiency and Environmental Ratings

The Puma Electric variant clearly leads in emissions, achieving a zero-emission drive on shorter trips — a future-proof option for urban low-emission zones.

Reliability and Maintenance

• Ford Puma: Backed by Ford’s EcoBoost reliability record, with average maintenance intervals every 15,000 km. Hybrid models benefit from simplified servicing due to reduced mechanical wear.
• Nissan Juke: Known for solid build quality and low long-term costs. The hybrid version uses proven components from the Nissan–Renault alliance, ensuring longevity and lower repair risks.

Trim Levels and Customization

Ford Puma Trims

• Titanium: Entry-level comfort with essential tech
• ST-Line: Sport-inspired design and suspension
• ST-Line X / Vivid Ruby: Premium materials, 18" alloys, full LED package
• Puma ST: High-performance 168 HP version with tuned suspension

Nissan Juke Trims

• Acenta: Smart standard package
• N-Connecta: Adds NissanConnect and parking aids
• Tekna: Premium safety and Bose sound system
• N-Sport: Hybrid-exclusive with visual upgrades

Verdict: Ford Puma vs Nissan Juke — Which Should You Choose?

Choosing between these two compact SUVs depends entirely on your priorities.

• Choose the Ford Puma if you want superior performance, hybrid innovation, and class-leading cargo space. It’s the driver’s choice — sporty, refined, and efficient.
• Choose the Nissan Juke if you value affordability, iconic styling, and everyday comfort. It’s the urban choice — stylish, reliable, and practical.

Both SUVs define the modern compact crossover, but in 2025, the Ford Puma edges ahead for its broader powertrain range, advanced hybrid efficiency, and unbeatable versatility.

FAQs

1. Which car is more powerful, the Ford Puma or the Nissan Juke?
The Ford Puma delivers up to 168 HP, outperforming the Nissan Juke’s 143 HP maximum output.

2. Which SUV offers better fuel economy?
The Nissan Juke’s hybrid achieves 4.7 L/100 km, making it slightly more efficient than the Puma’s 5.4 L/100 km.

3. Does the Ford Puma have an electric version?
Yes, the Ford Puma offers a fully electric variant with up to 376 km range on a single charge.

4. Which model has more boot space?
The Ford Puma leads with 523 litres, versus 422 litres in the Nissan Juke.

Nissan Juke vs Toyota C-HR: Complete Comparison of Specs, Performance, Efficiency, Space, and Cost

Are Nissan Juke Reliable? The Ultimate Reliability and Maintenance Guide (2025 Edition)

Best Nissan Juke Alternatives: 12 Compact SUVs Worth Considering in 2025

5. Which SUV is better overall?
For performance and versatility — the Ford Puma. For affordability and unique design — the Nissan Juke.

If you want to know other articles similar to Ford Puma vs Nissan Juke: Ultimate Compact SUV Comparison for 2025 you can visit the category Blog.