Nissan Juke vs Toyota C-HR: Complete Comparison of Specs, Performance, Efficiency, Space, and Cost

Overview: Nissan Juke or Toyota C-HR – Which SUV Fits You Better?

We compare the Nissan Juke and the Toyota C-HR in depth: power output (up to 143 HP vs up to 223 HP), boot capacity (422 L vs 447 L), fuel consumption (from 4.7 L/100 km vs from 0.8 L/100 km equivalent in plug-in hybrid mode), and starting price (26,600 € vs 34,600 €). We also look at size, driving tech, hybrid systems, everyday usability, and running costs.
This guide shows exactly where each SUV wins.

Best Nissan Juke Alternatives: 12 Compact SUVs Worth Considering in 2025

Dimensions and Road Presence

Nissan Juke Dimensions

• Length: 4,210 mm
• Width: 1,800 mm
• Height: 1,593 mm
• Kerb weight: 1,274 – 1,405 kg
• Doors / Seats: 5 / 5

Toyota C-HR Dimensions

• Length: 4,362 mm
• Width: 1,832 mm
• Height: 1,558 – 1,564 mm
• Kerb weight: 1,505 – 1,755 kg
• Doors / Seats: 5 / 5

Size Analysis

• The Toyota C-HR is longer (+152 mm) and wider (+32 mm). That extra footprint translates into more cabin presence and more rear comfort.
• The Nissan Juke is taller in stance, which helps with visibility in traffic and gives that “sit high” SUV feeling.
• Weight matters: the Juke is significantly lighter. This benefits low-speed agility, parking, and manoeuvrability in dense urban areas.

Luggage Capacity and Practical Space

Boot Space (Seats Up)

• Nissan Juke: 354 – 422 litres
• Toyota C-HR: 350 – 447 litres

What This Means

• Both are genuinely usable daily-family crossovers, not just style pieces.
• Juke reaches up to 422 L, which is strong for its class given its shorter body.
• C-HR goes up to 447 L, so it can swallow more weekend luggage when specified in its most cargo-friendly configuration.
• If you carry pushchairs, sports bags, or camera/storage gear, the C-HR offers a slight edge in absolute capacity.
• If you mainly drive solo or in pairs and want compact footprint + still respectable boot space, the Juke delivers a strong balance of size vs practicality.

Powertrain Lineup and Performance

Nissan Juke Engine Options

• Petrol (1.0 DIG-T):
  • Power: 114 HP
  • Cylinders: 3
  • Gearbox: manual or dual-clutch automatic
  • 0–100 km/h: ~10.1 – 11.8 s
  • Top speed: 166 – 180 km/h
  • Combined fuel use: approx. 5.8–6.0 L/100 km depending on spec
• Full Hybrid (1.6 Full Hybrid):
  • Power: 143 HP
  • Cylinders: 4
  • Gearbox: automatic
  • 0–100 km/h: ~10–11 s
  • Top speed: up to 180 km/h
  • Combined fuel use: from 4.7 L/100 km
  • CO₂: from 107 g/km

Toyota C-HR Engine Options

• Full Hybrid:
  • Power: ~140+ HP
  • Cylinders: 4
  • Transmission: automatic CVT
  • Drivetrain: front-wheel drive or available all-wheel drive
  • 0–100 km/h: ~9.9 s
  • Top speed: ~175 – 180 km/h
  • CO₂: from 115 g/km down to very low values depending on spec
• Plug-in Hybrid:
  • Power: up to 223 HP
  • Transmission: automatic CVT
  • Drivetrain: typically front-wheel drive (AWD also offered in hybrid variants)
  • 0–100 km/h: from 7.4 s
  • Official combined consumption: as low as 0.8 L/100 km (thanks to electric running)
  • Electric-only range: up to 68 km
  • CO₂: from 17 g/km

Acceleration and Real-World Pace

• Juke is tuned for balanced urban response, not outright speed.
• C-HR Plug-in Hybrid is genuinely quick for this segment. A 7.4 s 0–100 km/h sprint puts it in “hot-hatch torque surge” territory.

Transmission and Drivetrain Technology

Nissan Juke

• Manual gearbox available on petrol engines.
• Dual-clutch automatic (DCT) offered, delivering fast, efficient shifts without the rubber-band feel of some CVTs.
• Front-wheel drive across the range.
• This setup appeals to drivers who still want a manual or a sporty-feeling DCT without going premium.

Toyota C-HR

• Automatic only.
• CVT-based hybrid system prioritises smoothness and fuel efficiency.
• Available with front-wheel drive or with all-wheel drive (in selected hybrid variants), giving more traction in poor weather or on wet/uneven roads.
• This is attractive if all-season stability matters.

Fuel Consumption, Battery, and Running Costs

Nissan Juke Efficiency

• Fuel consumption: 4.7 – 6.0 L/100 km depending on engine
• Fuel tank: 46 L
• Hybrid battery capacity: approx. 0.60 kWh (self-charging hybrid)
• CO₂ output: 107 – 136 g/km
• No plug-in charging; you refuel with petrol like normal.

Toyota C-HR Efficiency

• Fuel consumption (full hybrid): 5.1 L/100 km or better, depending on tune
• Fuel consumption (plug-in hybrid): as low as 0.8 L/100 km in official testing because it can run on electricity alone for short trips
• Electric-only range (plug-in hybrid): up to 68 km
• Fuel tank: 43 L
• CO₂ output: as low as 17 g/km in plug-in configuration
• For short commutes, many daily journeys can be completed largely on electric drive, drastically cutting petrol usage.

Running Cost Positioning

• Juke Hybrid is efficient without charging cables. It suits drivers who just want to fill up and go.
• C-HR Plug-in Hybrid is built for drivers who can recharge at home or work and want to slash fuel bills.

Price Positioning and Budget Impact

Nissan Juke Pricing

• From ~26,600 €
• Upper end around ~35,700 € depending on spec and equipment

Toyota C-HR Pricing

• From ~34,600 €
• Upper end around ~50,800 € for high-output plug-in hybrid versions with advanced tech

Value Analysis

• The Juke undercuts the C-HR by several thousand euros at entry level.
• Even a well-equipped Juke Hybrid often sits below the cost of a mid/high-spec C-HR.
• The C-HR asks more but returns more performance headroom, more tech capability, and the possibility of near-electric commuting.

Cabin Experience and Interior Technology

Nissan Juke Interior Focus

• Bold, youthful design language that mirrors the exterior
• Driver-centric cockpit feel
• Intuitive physical controls for core functions, which many daily drivers still prefer
• Strong sense of personality, highly customisable look and trim
• Taller cabin profile helps deliver that upright “SUV feel” and good forward visibility

Toyota C-HR Interior Focus

• Sophisticated, almost coupe-like environment
• High-tech safety and driver-assistance systems baked in at a very mature level
• Seamless integration of infotainment, connectivity, and driver aids
• Feels more premium and more “grown up,” especially in higher trims

Everyday Usability and Comfort

Nissan Juke Everyday Strengths

• Compact exterior footprint + light weight = easy to park, easy to place in traffic, confidence in narrow streets
• Ride height and visibility boost driver confidence in urban environments
• Practical boot for its size (up to 422 L), enough for groceries, luggage, light gear
• Manual gearbox option for drivers who still want that mechanical engagement

Toyota C-HR Everyday Strengths

• Cabin width and length give passengers a bit more room, especially in the back
• More boot volume in certain trims (up to 447 L) for family travel or bulk shopping
• Available all-wheel drive improves stability in bad weather and light adventure scenarios
• Plug-in variant offers silent electric starts, low-vibration city driving, and instant torque

CO₂ Classes and Environmental Positioning

Nissan Juke

• CO₂ efficiency classes reported as D, E, C depending on configuration
• Hybrid version significantly improves efficiency and emissions compared to the pure petrol units

Toyota C-HR

• CO₂ efficiency classes reported as C, B in its latest forms
• Plug-in hybrid versions achieve extremely low tailpipe CO₂ figures thanks to electric-only capability

This matters if you drive in cities with emissions-based taxation, clean-air zones, or company-car benefit rules that reward lower CO₂.

Best Nissan Juke Alternatives: 12 Compact SUVs Worth Considering in 2025

Is the Nissan Juke a Good First Car? A Complete UK Buyer’s Guide

Target Driver Profiles (Who Should Choose Which?)

Nissan Juke: Ideal Buyer Profile

We recommend the Nissan Juke if you:

Best Nissan Juke Alternatives: 12 Compact SUVs Worth Considering in 2025

Is the Nissan Juke a Good First Car? A Complete UK Buyer’s Guide

MG HS Full Price, Versions, and Specifications Guide (2025 Update)

• Want a more affordable entry price
• Prefer a compact, agile SUV that’s easy in tight city streets
• Like having a manual gearbox or a snappy-feeling dual-clutch automatic
• Want distinctive styling and a higher seating position without committing to a large footprint
• Are comfortable with front-wheel drive and do not need all-wheel drive capability

Toyota C-HR: Ideal Buyer Profile

We recommend the Toyota C-HR if you:

• Want maximum efficiency and the option of plug-in hybrid tech
• Like the idea of driving most weekdays on near-electric power (up to ~68 km EV range in the plug-in variant)
• Value stronger acceleration (as quick as 7.4 s 0–100 km/h) and up to 223 HP
• Need slightly more cargo flexibility (up to 447 L) and rear passenger comfort
• Are willing to invest more upfront to access premium tech, refinement, and (in some configurations) all-wheel drive

Nissan Juke Technical Summary (Key Specs)

• Body style: SUV
• Seats / Doors: 5 / 5
• Model year: 2024
• Engines: petrol / full hybrid
• Power: 114 – 143 HP (84 – 105 kW)
• Cylinders: 3 or 4
• Displacement: 999 – 1,598 cm³
• Gearboxes: manual, dual-clutch automatic, conventional automatic on hybrid
• Driven wheels: front-wheel drive
• 0–100 km/h: 10.1 – 11.8 s
• Top speed: 166 – 180 km/h
• Fuel use: 4.7 – 6.0 L/100 km
• CO₂: 107 – 136 g/km
• Fuel tank: 46 L
• Boot capacity: 354 – 422 L
• Length / Width / Height: 4,210 / 1,800 / 1,593 mm
• Payload capacity: 405 – 427 kg
• Kerb weight: 1,274 – 1,405 kg
• CO₂ efficiency class: D, E, C
• Price range: ~26,600 € – 35,700 €
• Brand: Nissan

Toyota C-HR Technical Summary (Key Specs)

• Body style: SUV
• Seats / Doors: 5 / 5
• Model year: 2024 – 2025
• Engines: full hybrid / plug-in hybrid
• Power: 140 – 223 HP (103 – 164 kW)
• Cylinders: 4
• Displacement: 1,798 – 1,987 cm³
• Transmission: automatic CVT
• Driven wheels: front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive (depending on variant)
• 0–100 km/h: 7.4 – 9.9 s
• Top speed: 175 – 180 km/h
• Fuel use (hybrid): ~5.1 L/100 km
• Fuel use (plug-in hybrid): from 0.8 L/100 km (with regular charging)
• Electric-only range (plug-in hybrid): up to 68 km
• CO₂: 17 – 115 g/km
• Fuel tank: 43 L
• Boot capacity: 350 – 447 L
• Length / Width / Height: 4,362 / 1,832 / 1,558–1,564 mm
• Payload capacity: 375 – 425 kg
• Kerb weight: 1,505 – 1,755 kg
• CO₂ efficiency class: C, B
• Price range: ~34,600 € – 50,800 €
• Brand: Toyota

Final Verdict

• Choose the Nissan Juke if you want standout styling, a taller driving position, a lighter and more compact body for city life, access to both manual and dual-clutch automatic gearboxes, and a significantly lower entry price. Its hybrid version delivers genuinely respectable efficiency (from 4.7 L/100 km) without asking you to ever plug in.
• Choose the Toyota C-HR if you want next-level hybrid technology, the option of a plug-in hybrid with up to 223 HP and rapid acceleration, the ability to cover short trips almost fully on electric power, slightly more usable rear space and boot volume, available all-wheel drive, and a premium-feeling interior. It costs more, but it also gives more in performance headroom, tech depth, and long-term efficiency potential.

In simple terms: the Juke is the smart-money urban crossover with personality; the C-HR is the tech-loaded efficiency weapon that can replace a traditional petrol car for a lot of daily driving.

If you want to know other articles similar to Nissan Juke vs Toyota C-HR: Complete Comparison of Specs, Performance, Efficiency, Space, and Cost you can visit the category Blog.